Just Another Zionist Buddhist Wordpress Site

Category: zionism Page 2 of 4

The deep roots of antisemitism in the Islamic world

At the moment this post is mostly just a list of links. I hope to come back later and provide a brief overview of each of the linked-to items. They all pertain to the subject indicated by the title of this post: “The deep roots of antisemitism in the Islamic world.” The main point is to show that the blind hatred for Israel that pervades modern day Islam did not spring forth, fully formed, when the state of Israel came into existence as a result of the Israeli War of Independence from 1947 to 1949.

In fact, the war of 47-49 was the result of antisemitism, not its cause. The war began when the United Nations proposed to partition Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab state. A two-state solution. The Arab state proposed in 1947 would have had twice as much land as the Gaza Strip and the West Bank combined. Why did this proposal lead to war? Because the Arabs of Palestine, joined by the entire Arab world, completely rejected the idea of having a Jewish state in Palestine.

The Arab rejection of the 1947 partition plan was really not terribly surprising, considering the fact that they had also rejected the partition plan proposed by the British in 1937, which would have given the Arabs even more land (and the Jews even less).

Why were the Arabs so adamantly opposed to a Jewish state in their midst? Arabs and Jews had lived side-by-side for centuries throughout the Middle East and North Africa. But Jews had always held a subordinate position. Now the Jews were seeking the very same thing that the Arabs sought – self determination. But to the (overwhelmingly Muslim) Arabs the idea of Jews having the same rights as Arabs was intolerable. This is the essence of antisemitism, and this essence had been there all along.

In Ishmael’s House: A History of Jews In Muslim Lands  by Martin Gilbert
https://www.martingilbert.com/book/in-ishmaels-house-a-history-of-jews-in-muslim-lands/

The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise Muslims, Christians, and Jews under Islamic Rule in Medieval Spain by Darío Fernández-Morera
https://isi.org/intercollegiate-review/the-myth-of-the-andalusian-paradise/

Convivencia and the “Ornament of the World” by Kenneth Baxter Wolf
https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=pomona_fac_pub

Convivencia in Medieval Spain: A Brief History of an Idea by Kenneth Baxter Wolf
https://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_fac_pub/23/

Nazis, Islamic Antisemitism and the Middle East: The 1948 Arab War against Israel and the Aftershocks of World War II by Matthias Küntzel
http://www.matthiaskuentzel.de/contents/nazis-islamic-antisemitism-and-the-middle-east/

Genocidal Antisemitism: A Core Ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood by Markos Zografos
https://isgap.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/GenocidalAntisemitism-Markos-Zografos.pdf

Antisemitism in the Middle East: Unpacking the Root Causes and Implications for Regional Stability

  • Evin Ismail, Senior Lecturer in Political Science at the Swedish Defence University
  • Matthias Küntzel, Political Scientist and Historian
  • Tal-Or Cohen Montemayor, Founder & CEO of CyberWell
  • Vered Andre’ev, Head of Research at CyberWell

https://extremism.gwu.edu/antisemitism-middle-east

Lies, Damned Lies, and “I meant to say ‘Zionists'” (UPDATED)

[UPDATE: As of July 9, Meta has updated its Hate Speech policy to reflect the fact that in some cases “‘Zionist’ … may be used as a proxy to refer to Jewish or Israeli people”. See bottom or post for more details.]

Way back in 2007, Nick Jackson wrote a piece for the the Independent titled ”Zionist” has now become an insult, an epithet for evil’. Here’s part of what Jackson wrote:

“There are many spheres in Britain in which it has become common sense that Israel is a unique and radical evil in the world. ‘Zionist’ has now become an insult, an epithet for evil.

These shared assumptions about Israel are fertile ground for the emergence of an anti-Semitic movement…..

There’s an overenthusiasm about anti-Zionism. British and American operations in Falluja cared less about civilian casualties than Israeli operations in Gaza. Israel is far from the most serious human-rights abuser on the planet, but how to explain this focus on the uniqueness of Israeli evil? ….

You can see it in the way people think about Hizbollah and Hamas. Both have openly genocidal policies towards the Jews, and yet, in the summer, placards reading, ‘We are all Hizbollah now’, were accepted on peace demonstrations.

This hasn’t always been the case. In fact, Nick Jackson’s 2007 article is the first time (that I know of) that anyone had publicly called attention to how “Zionist” was becoming more widely used as “an epithet for evil”.

A key moment in the evolution of “Zionist” into an antisemitic slur was June 9, 2009, when Barack Obama’s former pastor Jeremiah Wright infamously claimed, in an interview with the Daily Press of Newport News Virginia (direct link to article): “Them Jews ain’t going to let him talk to me.” This was an in-your-face textbook example of one of the hallmarks of classical antisemitism: the sinister, all pervasive power of “Them Jews”. Two days later, Wright tried to extricate himself with the explanation: “I meant to say ‘Zionists'” (in an interview with Sirius XM host Mark Thompson – here is a politico.com article about it). While this didn’t convince anyone, it did send out the clear message: you can take even the most obvious antisemitic tropes and simply repace “Jews” with “Zionists” and, voila, it’s no longer antisemitism! And the real beauty of it is that everyone still knows exactly who you are really talking about! The one rule is: don’t say “Jews” first and then later claim you meant to say “Zionists”. Just say “Zionists” from the start, and you’re good.

Here is a somewhat random collection of links and quotes that give a very rough outline of how things have progressed since then.

Demystifying Zionism Yakov Rabkin September 2009
https://yakovrabkin.ca/israel-and-zionism/demystifying-zionism/

The word “Zionism” means different things to different people. Some use it a badge of honour, unconditionally defending the state of Israel right or wrong. Yet, many Zionists take umbrage at the appellation of Israel as a Zionist state. They insist that it is a “Jewish state”, a “state of the Jewish people”. Quite a few people who identify themselves as Zionists, are distressed by what Israel is and does, but remain reluctant to express their distress in public. Others, including quite a few Israelis, see Zionism as the main obstacle to peace in Israel/Palestine, a path to collective suicide. And, finally, in some circles the word is used as an insult.

What Exactly is Zionism? Camera on Campus December 30, 2015
https://cameraoncampus.org/blog/what-exactly-is-zionism/

Zionism is how I connect to my Judaism and it is being slandered as a racist ideology that supports apartheid and oppression across college campuses by anti-Israel and anti-Semitic hate groups like Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP). It is a new way to insult Jewish people without directly coming off as anti-Semitic.

Zionisms …this is, in part, a plea to the left to stop saying ‘Zionist’ (Andrea Shieber | 05 May 2016)
https://blogs.kent.ac.uk/countercurrents/2016/05/05/zionisms-this-is-in-part-a-plea-to-the-left-to-stop-saying-zionist/

Zionism has become a dirty word for many on the left.

Antisemitic anti-Zionism and the scandal of Oxford University Labour Club Alex Chalmers, Spring 2016
https://fathomjournal.org/antisemitic-anti-zionism-and-the-scandal-of-oxford-university-labour-club/

“Instead, when I was at the 2015 Labour Party conference with fellow members of the Oxford University Labour Club (OULC), several attended the LFI (Labour Friends of Israel) reception wearing Palestine Solidarity Campaign lanyards and made a point of smirking when the assassination Yitzhak Rabin was mentioned by one of the speakers. When I confronted one of those members later in the evening and raised the work Rabin had done for peace, working with the Palestinian leadership to produce the Oslo Accords, the response I received was, ‘Who cares? He was a Zionist.’

Anti-Zionism as a prerequisite for antisemitism (By AVI TEICH APRIL 16, 2023)
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-739302

Anti-Zionism is a form of antisemitism; not always out of ill intent but often from ignorance to a term regularly spewed but rarely defined clearly.

Meta considers reporting derogatory use of “Zionist” term amid rising anti-Semitism (February 10, 2024):
https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/americas/1707596559-meta-considers-reporting-derogatory-use-of-zionist-term-amid-rising-anti-semitism

A spokesperson for Meta stated that the company is reviewing posts containing the term “Zionist,” recognizing its potential to convey anti-Semitic sentiment. While acknowledging that “Zionist” often refers to a political ideology rather than a protected characteristic, Meta emphasized that the term can also be used to target Jewish or Israeli individuals.

World Jewish Congress Praises Meta Policy Decision to Prevent Antisemitic Use of the Term ‘Zionist’ 09 Jul 2024
https://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/wjc-praises-meta-decision-antisemitic-use-of-zionist

‘Zionist’ as a proxy for hate speech JUL 9, 2024
https://transparency.meta.com/Hate-Speech-Update-July2024

Other related posts in this blog:
Does Wester Buddhism Have a “Zionism Problem”?
Top Ten Signs Your “Criticism of Israel” Is Really Just Antisemitism

Does Western Buddhism Have a “Zionism Problem”?

A little while back I posted Top Ten Signs Your ‘Criticism of Israel’ Is Really Just Antisemitism. Number Three on that list was “You use the word ‘Zionist’ as an insult”.

It would be hard to find a more straightforward example of using the word “Zionist” (or, in this case, “Zionism”) as an insult than the article Western Buddhist Dharma Has a Zionism Problem by Weyam Ghadbian. This brief article is found in the pdf document Gaza: Calling for a Dharma Response, dated April 27, 2024.

Ghadbian gets right to the point in the second paragraph of the article.

While several of these Western Buddhist dharma institutions have expressed commitments to ending racism and gender oppression (thanks to the work of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color within them), none have included Zionism within that commitment. I have now come to expect Zionist remarks and/or microaggressions by teachers and students on every retreat I attend at such institutions.

Soon after this, Ghadbian declares that

many of the founders and practitioners of Western convert Buddhist centers are unquestioningly Zionist.

This is clearly intended to be heard as a damning accusation. Ghadbian soon wraps up her argument as follows:

But it’s time for us to move beyond our individual witness bearing, collectively and explicitly name Zionism as a form of oppression and commit to freeing Palestine as part of our greater commitment to justice and liberation.

In just a few paragraphs Ghadbian has managed to

  1. Equate Zionism with racism.
  2. Demand, therefore, that Buddhists who claim to be against racism must denounce Zionism.
  3. Claim that she is the constant victim of “Zionist remarks and other microagressions … at every retreat I attend.”
  4. Insinuate that Zionists and Zionism exert a pervasive and pernicious influence within “Western convert Buddhist centers”.
  5. Demand that Western Buddhists must “explicitly name Zionism as a form of oppression.”

This is precisely the kind of crypto-antisemitism that has long held sway in the Western left, and especially in the “Palestine Solidarity” movement. It is perhaps not surprising to now see it being propagated in the West by self-proclaimed “engaged Buddhists”.

It is important to emphasize that the same document contains a lengthy article by Bhikkhu Bodhi, a very prominent Western Buddhist teacher and scholar. And the document has also received rather glowing approval from Jon Kabat-Zinn who stated on X (the misinformation platform formerly known as Twitter) that the document constitutes

An incredibly thoughtful and necessary series of challenges to the global dharma community….

The fact that Bhikkhu Bodhi and Jon Kabat-Zinn are willing to lend their voices to give credence to the accusation that Western Buddhism has a “Zionism Problem” is proof that Western Buddhism certainly has an antisemitism problem.

When “Pro-Palestinian” Activists Say the Quiet Part Out Loud

Three weeks after the October 7 terrorist attack on Israel, Palestinian artist and film-maker Jumana Manna wrote about how she and other Palestinians had first reacted to the news of October 7th, and how, at least for her, that reaction quickly changed.

In her article (The Embargo on Empathy), she wrote:

Upon hearing early news that Hamas militants breached the barrier surrounding the Gaza Strip, I shared a few stories on my Instagram page. One of the stories in question was a photo reel showing the scene of a rave celebrating “peace and love” a mere three miles from the highly militarized concrete walls imprisoning Gaza. More than two million people, mostly refugees, sequestered inside these walls and under siege since at least 2007, are forced to live in an open-air prison that subjects them to conditions that violate international law.

Seeing these borders momentarily torn down and flown over, many Palestinians were moved by the stubborn and creative will to break free from captivity. Images of the parachute gliders appeared in our feeds alongside a tractor destroying the apartheid wall. Palestinian teenagers filmed themselves riding out on bikes and horses onto the lands from which their families were ethnically cleansed in 1948. We hoped this moment of fugitivity might restore the potential for life, liberation, and dignity for all in this wretched land, for this nightmarish fantasy of one-sided normalcy to end. These feelings were necessarily short-lived. We continue to watch in horror, along with the rest of the world.

At the time I shared my stories on Instagram, it had not become apparent that hundreds had been deliberately shot and kidnapped. I regretted my own comments after the news revealed the extent of the violence. To those who I am in solidarity with, Jewish, Arab, or otherwise: I neither sanction nor celebrate the murder of civilians and do not trivialize pain and grief.

What Jumana Manna has to say is quite important, because it provides a somewhat plausible explanation for how people could have initially celebrated what happened on October 7 before they knew the truth about the mass slaughter, rapes, and kidnappings on that day.

Jumana Manna’s article was referenced four and half months later in an article written by Mohammed El-Kurd titled “Are we indeed Palestinians?“, in which he wrote:

Since October 7, many public figures, many of them Palestinian, especially in the West, have reconsidered—even renounced—the catharsis they felt upon viewing the images of “Palestinian bulldozers” demolishing parts of the Israeli fence encircling Gaza. Many have regretted celebrating the paragliders escaping their concentration camp. (I put “Palestinian bulldozers” in quotes because it is an unbelievable phrase.)

“It had not [yet] become apparent that hundreds had been deliberately shot and kidnapped,” one artist wrote. It is hard to believe that anyone thought that the spectacular imagery of October 7 (capturing military tanks then dancing atop them) had happened without bloodshed. You begin to wonder whether those latent apologies were calculated business moves.

The Western world, with its prominent cultural and academic institutions, rejected Gaza’s upheaval against the siege, and it demanded that our intelligentsia act accordingly. We were commanded to uphold the status quo (a status quo many of us have built our careers critiquing discursively) in order to maintain our positions, our access, our reputations as the “good ones.”

Submission to the colonial logic that vilifies the violence of the oppressed and turns a blind eye to the oppressor’s violence became the price of admission. Some paid it without hesitation, others struggled as they did it.

In the above, El-Kurd is explicitly defending the actions of Hamas on October 7, and also explicitly criticizing those who initially supported Hamas’ actions only to have later “reconsidered—even renounced” that initial support. El-Kurd quotes directly from Manna’s November 1, 2023, article, although he does not name her.

There can be no mistaking the central point of Mohammed El-Kurd’s article: you cannot consider yourself a true supporter of the Palestinian cause unless you fully and publicly support what Hamas did on October 7.

On Instagram, The Palestinian Youth Movement posted a long quote from Mohammed El-Kurd’s article and a link to the full article. That post has since received over 32,000 “likes”. One of those likes was by Anna Carlson-Ziegler, who until yesterday was the campaign manager for Emily Randall, who is in a high profile neck-and-neck primary contest to be the Democratic nominee for the state of Washington’s 6th congressional seat.

So how does someone who has a good chance (perhaps less of a chance now, though) of becoming a member of the United States’ Congress end up hiring a public supporter of Hamas to be their campaign manager? As uncomfortable as that question is, the answer is even more uncomfortable. From its beginning, even before the founding of the state of Israel, the “pro-Palestinian” movement has always been concerned with only one thing: opposition to the very existence of the Jewish state of Israel by any means necessary.

In 1947 the Arabs of Palestine had a chance for their own sovereign state. United Nations resolution 181 would have created an Arab Palestinian state on 4,500 square miles of land, over twice the size of the Gaza strip and the West Bank combined. But the Arabs rejected that partition. Their rejection was not based on a difference of opinion over who got how much land or where the lines should be drawn. The Arab rejection of the 1947 “two-state solution” was based on an absolute opposition to the very idea of a Jewish state.

And so there was war in 1947 instead of peace, because that is what the Arabs of Palestine chose (the Jews of Palestine enthusiastically supported the partition plan). But it wasn’t just a war between the 600,000 Jews of Palestine and the 1.2 million Arabs of Palestine. It was a war between the 600,000 Jews of Palestine and the nearly 40 million Arabs of Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Lebanon, and Jordan, who all sent their armies to desperately try to prevent the creation of a Jewish state.

Without any support from the United States (or Great Britain, or any other major Western power), the Jews of Palestine withstood the attack from all sides by armies that vastly outnumbered them, and in the process they became the citizens of a new nation, Israel. This success of the Zionists has proven a hard reality for Arabs to accept, to this day. Even those who claim to recoil at the atrocities committed by Hamas on October 7, like Jumana Manna, nevertheless share the same dream as those who enthusiastically embrace those same atrocities as the very “means” that are “necessary”. Their dream is that of “return”, a return to how things were before 1948, when Israel officially declared it’s independent existence. They dream of a return to a world with no Israel.

The absolute rejection of the very idea of a Jewish state was the sole guiding principle upon which the Palestinian “cause” was founded. Pro-Palestinian activists have managed to rebrand the founding of the state of Israel, which was a humiliating cataclysm for them, as a badge of honor, the so-called “Nakba”. And this Nakba, in turn, is now widely perceived as the single greatest crime against humanity since the Third Reich. And if the founding of the state of Israel really was such a monstrous injustice, then that injustice will stand so long as Israel exists.

The violent destruction of the state of Israel is the quiet part that many pro-Palestinian activists prefer to leave unsaid. Some, like Jumana Manna, will demur when it comes to defending the “means”, but there is no disagreement over the “end”. But the argument put forward by Mohammed El-Kurd in defense of the atrocities of October 7 is really quite a good one: how else did you think this would be done?

I mean, seriously, what exactly did Jumana Manna suppose that Hamas militants would do once they broke through “the highly militarized concrete walls imprisoning Gaza” or once they landed their “parachute gliders”?

[For more on the case of Emily Randall’s pro-Hamas campaign manager, see the article Washington congressional candidate fires campaign manager over pro-Hamas social media activity by Marc Rod, writing for Jewishinsider.com. And on the same day that Emily Randall had to fire her campaign manager, a group of 150 “pro-Palestinian protesters” descended on Adas Torah synagogue, situated in the most densely populated Jewish community in Los Angeles, while chanting “There is only one solution, intifada revolution!” See more in this article at the Times of Israel: Violent clashes erupt between pro- and anti-Israel protesters outside LA synagogue.]

‘Intifada until victory’: Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in New York    https://www.timesofisrael.com/intifada-until-victory-pro-palestinian-demonstrators-rally-in-new-york/

Bhikkhu Bodhi and the Double Standard of Salience, Part Two

When Israel is treated differently from other countries, it is fair to ask: why? In such cases we must at least consider the simplest and most obvious explanation: Israel is treated differently because it is the only Jewish state. By itself this certainly does not constitute incontrovertible proof of antisemitism, but unless another, better explanation for the double standard can be found, then one is justified in suspecting antisemitism. Researchers who study antisemitism have identified at least five different kinds of double standards that can be evidence of antisemitism, as was discussed in a previous post in this blog: The Five Double Standards of Left Antisemitism.

This post is the second in a series specifically looking at the “double standard of salience”, and, more specifically, at how this double standard is clearly at work in Bhikkhu Bodhi’s February, 2024 article: Israel’s Gaza Campaign Is the Gravest Moral Crisis of Our Time.

Below is an overview of five terrible humanitarian crises curently happening around the world. My point is not that one or more of these crises is worse or more “grave” than the situation in Gaza. Rather my point is that anyone who wishes to make the claim that Gaza is the gravest crisis of them all, and who wishes to be taken seriously, must necessarily make some effort to compare the situation in Gaza with these other clear examples of terrible injustice and human suffering.

• The Congo conflict

According to the Council for Foreign Relations (link):

Since 1996, conflict in eastern DRC has led to approximately six million deaths. The First Congo War (1996–1997) began in the wake of the 1994 Rwandan Genocide, during which ethnic Hutu extremists killed an estimated one million minority ethnic Tutsis and moderate Hutus in Rwanda (DRC’s neighbor to the east).

According to the International Holocaust Memorial Museum (link):

The Democratic Republic of Congo has experienced violent conflict since the start of the First Congo War in 1996–97. The Second Congo War (1998–2003), was the deadliest conflict since World War II. Today there is an ongoing political crisis as government power-sharing agreements are falling apart. The crisis is further complicated by multiple violent conflicts involving over one hundred armed groups, and multiple health epidemics including Ebola, COVID-19, and measles. The risk of a new mass killing in the Democratic Republic of Congo remains high, and our Early Warning Project has ranked the country in the top-10 highest-risk countries every year since the project began in 2014.

According to Al Jazeera (link):

Approximately six million people have been killed since 1996 and more than six million people remain internally displaced in eastern DRC [Democratic Republic of Congo].

The three quotes provided above only scratch the surface of the horrors of the ongoing Congo wars. The scale of this moral crisis is even greater when one understands that this conflict is in many ways an extension and continuation of the Rwandan genocide of 1994.

• The Syrian Civil War

According to Council for Foreign Relations (link):

What began as protests against President Assad’s regime in 2011 quickly escalated into a full-scale war between the Syrian government—backed by Russia and Iran—and anti-government rebel groups—backed by the United States and a rotating number of U.S. allies, including France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Three campaigns drive the conflict: coalition efforts to defeat the self-proclaimed Islamic State, violence between the Syrian government and opposition forces, and military operations against Syrian Kurds by Turkish forces…..

Meanwhile, the humanitarian situation in Syria remains dire, with 7 out of 10 Syrians requiring humanitarian assistance. According to estimates from the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, more than 600,000 people have been killed since the start of the war. In its 2023 Global Appeal, the United Nations reported that more than 6.9 million are currently internally displaced, with more than 5.4 million living as refugees abroad. Many refugees have fled to Jordan and Lebanon, straining already weak infrastructures and limited resources. More than 3.4 million Syrians have fled to Turkey, and many have attempted to seek refuge in Europe.

According to researchers Aleksandar Kešeljević and Rok Spruk writing for the journal Empirical Economics (link):

According to the UNHRC more than 350,000 people have been killed, with 6.2 million displaced, including 2.5 million children within Syria. Furthermore, more than 700,000 Syrian nationals are estimated to have sought political asylum in Europe in 2015 and 2016 (Eurostat 2022; World Bank 2017a). As a result of the war, a pre-conflict population of over 20 million has declined to 18.2 million. Around 11.9 million people have been forcibly displaced within Syria and across its borders, out of which 5.7 million are refugees and 6.2 million are internally displaced. Moreover, a report by The Syrian Center for Policy Research (2015) shows that 80% of the population is now below the poverty line compared to 12.4% in 2007.

According to Al-Jazeera (link):

Twelve years ago, protesters dared to take to the streets of Syria to protest against the country’s government and its president, Bashar al-Assad.

The protests quickly took on a revolutionary nature, demanding the “fall of the regime”, but, after a violent response from the government, the uprising transformed into a war, dragging in several outside powers, displacing millions and killing hundreds of thousands.

Syria’s economy has deteriorated, with 90 percent of the population now living below the poverty line, according to the World Food Programme.

The United Nations estimated last year that more than 306,000 civilians have been killed – about 1.5 percent of the population – since March 2011 in the country.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a United Kingdom-based war monitor, estimates the total death toll to be about 610,000.

Much more detail about the ongoing humanitarian nightmare in Syria can be found at the links above. Its also noteworthy that the Syrian civil war has involved multiple cases of the use of chemical weapons, in at least one case leading to over a thousand deaths: Timeline of Syrian Chemical Weapons Activity, 2012-2022.

• Civil War in Sudan

According to the Council on Foreign Relations (link):

In April 2023, fighting between rival armed factions broke out in the Sudanese capital of Khartoum, raising fears of a return to full-scale civil war. The conflict is primarily a power struggle between the leaders of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and a powerful paramilitary group known as the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The two groups, led by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Mohamed Hamdan “Hemedti” Dagalo, respectively, are battling one another for control of the state and its resources. As the conflict deepens, humanitarian conditions are declining, and the promise of a long-awaited democratic transition diminishes…..
Several NGOs, including Human Rights Watch, have documented evidence of numerous mass atrocities committed throughout the conflict, prompting accusations of ethnic cleansing and war crimes. In early November, RSF forces and allied militias killed more than 800 people in a multi-day rampage in Ardamata, a town in western Darfur. This recent attack reflects a new surge of ethnically driven killings targeting the Masalit in West Darfur. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNCHR) Filippo Grandi warned that current violence is emblematic of the U.S.-recognized genocide in Darfur that killed an estimated 300,000 people between 2003 and 2005. A statement made by the UN in January indicated that between 10,000 and 15,000 people had been killed last year due to ethnic violence by the RSF and its allies in West Darfur. In April 2024, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield highlighted evidence indicating that women and girls as young as fourteen years old have been victims of sexual violence perpetrated by the RSF.

According to Deutsche Welle (link):

The list of wartime atrocities in Sudan is long and getting longer.

A maternity hospital bombed, causing the roof to fall onto babies inside. Refugee camps shelled, mass executions, streets filled with corpses, aid blocked, systematic sexual abuse and other war crimes: since the civil war started a year ago in the northeast African country, an estimated 16,000 people have been killed.

Sudan’s war has also created the world’s worst displacement crisis, with just under 10 million people forced to move to find safety. Last week, the United Nation’s International Organization for Migration reported that of the millions of Sudanese displaced, 70% were “now trying to survive in places that are at risk of famine.”
…. Why is no attention being paid to Sudan?

In mid-April, Melissa Fleming, the under-secretary-general for global communications at the UN, wrote a self-published op-ed in which she explored this question.

One reason for the lack of attention might be what is known as “psychic numbing,” Fleming wrote. “The term … refers to the sad reality that people feel more apathetic towards a tragedy as the number of victims increases.”

Other crises happening simultaneously can also have a numbing effect, she added — everything from climate change to the conflict in Gaza and the Ukraine war.

According to Al-Jazeera (link):

The war has spread across several regions of the country and led to the collapse of infrastructural systems including healthcare and sanitation services, as well as causing thousands of deaths and the displacement of millions. The precise number of people killed is very unclear, with reports varying from one source to another.

As of April 2024, nearly 16,000 people, including military personnel, had been killed, according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED). However, ACLED and experts have said those numbers are a significant undercount, due to the difficulty in collecting accurate, real-time data during a conflict of this nature.

A report by the UN refugee agency, UNHCR, in October stated that nearly 4,000 civilians had been killed and 8,400 injured in Darfur alone, between April 15 and the end of August. According to a UN report seen by Reuters in January, between 10,000 and 15,000 people had been killed in just one city – El Geneina, in Sudan’s West Darfur region – last year….
Sudan is currently “experiencing a humanitarian crisis of epic proportions”, according to the UN. The country is grappling with acute shortages of essential items such as food, clean water, medicines and fuel. Prices have skyrocketed as a result of the scarcity.

Approximately half of Sudan’s 49 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance, the UN says. Nearly 18 million are also facing “catastrophe levels of food insecurity”, especially in parts of West Darfur, Khartoum, and among the IDPs.

Aid groups are struggling to provide humanitarian assistance because of blocked access, security risks and other logistical challenges. In March, the UN was able to distribute food aid to West Darfur for the first time in months.

As noted in the Al-Jazeera quote above, “The precise number of people killed is very unclear, with reports varying from one source to another.” In February (2024), US Special Envoy for Sudan Tom Perriello told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (link): “We literally don’t know how many people have died, possibly to a factor of 10 or 15. The number was mentioned earlier 15 to 30,000. Some think it’s at 150,000.”

• War in Yemen

Council on Foreign Relations (link):

Yemen’s civil war began in 2014 when Houthi insurgents—Shiite rebels with links to Iran and a history of rising up against the Sunni government—took control of Yemen’s capital and largest city, Sanaa, demanding lower fuel prices and a new government. Following failed negotiations, the rebels seized the presidential palace in January 2015, leading President Abd Rabbu Mansour Hadi and his government to resign. Beginning in March 2015, a coalition of Gulf states led by Saudi Arabia launched a campaign of economic isolation and air strikes against the Houthi insurgents, with U.S. logistical and intelligence support….

Meanwhile, the conflict has taken a heavy toll on Yemeni civilians, making Yemen the world’s worst humanitarian crisis. The UN estimates that 60 percent of the estimated 377,000 deaths in Yemen between 2015 and the beginning of 2022 were the result of indirect causes like food insecurity and lack of accessible health services. Two-thirds of the population, or 21.6 million Yemenis, remain in dire need of assistance. Five million are at risk of famine, and a cholera outbreak has affected over one million people. All sides of the conflict are reported to have violated human rights and international humanitarian law.
Kurdistan

United Nations World Food Program (link):

Eight years of war in Yemen have taken a devastating toll on civilians. The conflict has claimed over 377,000 lives and displaced 4.5 million people. 21 million people need humanitarian assistance, and 17 million people in Yemen are extremely hungry .

The conflict has destroyed the country’s infrastructure, including major roads and airports. The collapse of the economy, high cost of goods and devalued currency make it very difficult for people to access basic necessities.

According to Ahmed Nagi, writing for Foreign Affairs (link, but note that you have to provide your email to read the whole article):

The eight-year civil war in Yemen has created what has been called the world’s worst manmade humanitarian crisis. Hundreds of thousands of Yemenis have been killed and some four million people displaced. According to the United Nations, 21.6 million people in the country require humanitarian assistance and 80 percent of the population struggles to put food on the table. Given the extent of the catastrophe, it is perhaps no surprise that observers rejoiced when the Saudi ambassador to Yemen, Mohammed Al-Jaber, shook hands with leaders of the Houthi rebel group, which is allied with Iran, in April. It appeared to be a breakthrough in a devastating, unending conflict.

According to Save the Children, by 2022 as many as 85,000 children may have starved to death in Yemen due to the civil war (link). And here is a link to a Timeline of the Yemen Crisis from The Arab Center of Washington DC.

• Kurdistan

The “Kurdish Problem” is certainly one of most neglected human rights issues in the world. If Kurdistan were a soverign nation, its population would be about 30 million,  larger than Syria (22M),  and almost twice the size of Jordan (11M) and Lebanon (5.5M) combined. It would also be more populous than all the nations of Scandinavia put together (28M). But instead, the Kurdish people are dispersed among the states of Turkey, Syria, Iran, Iraq, and Armenia. When the modern borders of the Middle East were drawn, the Kurds were simply invisible.

In Iraq a separate Kurdish autonomous region is recognized by the Iraqi central government, and one must admit that this is actually a positive result of the 2003 US invasion of Iraq. In Syria the defacto autonomous Kurdish region of Rojava exists in spite of efforts by the Assad government to assert control over the region (and here again, the United States has played small, and highly complex, role in supporting the Syrian Kurds). In Turkey, where Kurds constitue over 20% of the population, repression of the Kurds is fierce and ongoing.

Prior to the overthrow of Saddam, the violent persecution of the Kurdish people by the Iraqi government knew no limits. It was against the Kurds that Saddam used a combination of mustard gas and nerve agents, killing at least 3,000, probably more. This was the largest ever incident in human history of using chemical weapons against a civilian population. In all Saddam killed well over 100,000 Kurds, possibly as many as 200,000. Nearly all of them were civilians.

One of the most important aspects of modern Kurdish history is the heroic role (and this is not hyperbole) that the Kurds played in downfall of ISIS. For a while people were actually paying attention to and giving meaningful support to the Kurds, precisely because they were on the front lines of fighting ISIS. But as soon as ISIS was vanquished, this attention and support mostly vanished.

Here are some online sources for learning more about the Kurds and their ongoing struggles against the governments of Turkey, Iran, and Syria, as well as the remaining remnants of ISIS and other Islamist extremist groups:

Page 2 of 4

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén